کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5132668 | 1492054 | 2018 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
- Nutritional adequacy assessment needs to consider nutrient bioavailability.
- Animal-to-plant ratio may drive iron, zinc, protein and vitamin A bioavailability.
- Bioavailability factors were highly variable between individual French diets.
- Using average bioavailability factors may misestimate the prevalence of inadequacy.
- Animal-to-plant ratio poorly explained the variation of bioavailability factors.
Nutritional adequacy depends on nutrient intakes and bioavailability which strongly varies with the plant- or animal-origin of foods. The aim was to estimate iron, zinc, protein and vitamin A bioavailability from individual diets, and investigate its relation with the animal-to-plant ratio (A/P) of diets. Bioavailability was estimated in 1899 French diets using diet-based algorithms or food-group specific conversion factors. Nutrient inadequacy was estimated based on i) bioavailability calculated in each individual diet and ii) average bioavailability assumed for Western-diets. Mean iron absorption, zinc absorption, protein quality and β-carotene conversion factor were 13%, 30%, 92%, and 17:1, respectively. Bioavailability displayed a high variability between individual diets, poorly explained by their A/P. Using individual bioavailability led to different inadequacy prevalence than with average factors assumed for Western-diets. In this population, the A/P does not seem sufficient to predict nutrient bioavailability and the corresponding recommended intakes. Nutritional adequacy should be assessed using bioavailability accounting for individual diets composition.
Journal: Food Chemistry - Volume 238, 1 January 2018, Pages 73-81