کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1025619 | 1483200 | 2015 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Propose data sharing model based on motivational, institutional, and resource factors.
• The research model was validated by the results of a survey of 361 social scientists.
• Career benefit and risk significantly affect social scientists’ data sharing attitude.
• Attitude, effort, and norm significantly influence social scientists’ data sharing.
• Funding agency and journal's pressures and data repository need to be more encouraged.
The purpose of this study is to locate individual, institutional, and resource factors that influence data sharing behaviors among social scientists. Given the benefits to the social science disciplines in the advancement of scholarship, and the recent data sharing policy changes of funding agencies, it is necessary to determine the factors that support and impede data sharing behaviors. A research model was developed and validated based on the results of a survey of 361 social scientists. The model is informed by theory of planned behavior and institutional theory to map underlying individual motivations, institutional pressures, and availability of resources facilitating social scientists’ data sharing. It was found that social scientists’ data sharing behaviors are mainly driven by personal motivations (i.e., perceived career benefit and risk, perceived effort, and attitude toward data sharing) and perceived normative pressure. Funding agencies’ pressure, journals’ pressure, and availability of data repository were not found to be significant factors in influencing social scientists’ data sharing. This research suggests that personal motivations and norm of data sharing currently support social scientists’ data sharing; however, institutional pressures by funding agencies and journals and data repository need to be further encouraged to better facilitate social scientists’ data sharing behaviors.
Journal: International Journal of Information Management - Volume 35, Issue 4, August 2015, Pages 408–418