Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not

• The study examines 67 engineering research articles from 5 subdisciplines.
• Six engineering researchers coded full-length articles into moves and steps.
• There are some sections and moves conventional across all subdisciplines.
• No common move patterns exist throughout the papers across the subdisciplines.
• Limited similarities exist, such as the use of Move 5 Step 2 in 3 subdisciplines.

While many genre researchers have examined the rhetorical structure of research articles in various disciplines, few have investigated the complete structure of articles for students in engineering, a discipline that includes a wide range of fields. Using Swales’ move framework (1990), this paper analyzes the rhetorical structure of 67 engineering research articles from five subdisciplines: structural engineering, environmental engineering, electrical engineering, chemical engineering, and computer science. Six engineering researchers participated in the study by coding texts of full-length papers into moves and steps. The study found that the abstract, introduction, and concluding sections and some of their moves were conventional across all subdisciplines. The finding of no common move patterns throughout the papers across the subdisciplines is explained by the differences in the nature of research in each field. There were, however, limited subdisciplinary similarities such as the use of Move 5, Step 2 observed in environmental, electrical, and chemical engineering. The study results provide practical pedagogical resources, a theoretical background to guide writing in an engineering school, and implications for collaboration with researchers in specialized fields.