کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1103254 | 953726 | 2011 | 6 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

This article notes the difficulties in providing definitions of myth and, especially, definitions of how to ‘bust’ myths. It suggests a set of eight requirements for ‘mythbusting’ derived from an observation of Roy Harris’s concerted assault on the ‘language myth’. The requirements include a convincing history of the myth; an analysis which addresses the myth’s most fundamental premiss; provision of an alternative to the myth; an understanding of the myth as more than merely ‘structural’; an account of how pervasive the myth is; presentation of how the myth is sustained by a society; analysis of the role of education in sustaining the myth; and suggestions for how the myth can be busted without a violent assault on administrators and bureaucrats.
► History of language myth.
► Analysis of it.
► Provision of an alternative.
► How pervasive the myth is.
► How the myth is sustained.
Journal: Language Sciences - Volume 33, Issue 4, July 2011, Pages 511–516