کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1109192 1488355 2015 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Disparity of Learning Styles and Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Students
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ناسازگاری سبکهای یادگیری و مهارتهای تفکر نظم بالاتر در بین دانشآموزان فنی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی علوم انسانی و هنر هنر و علوم انسانی (عمومی)
چکیده انگلیسی

Learning styles and higher order thinking skills are an important aspect in teaching and learning especially at higher education institutions. The purpose of this research was to analysis the disparity in learning styles on the level of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) among technical students. A total of 375 technical students from four technical universities in Malaysia were randomly selected as samples. The Kolb Learning Styles Inventory and a set of questionnaires adapted from Marzano Rubrics for Specific Task or Situations were used as research instruments. This is a quantitative research and the gathered data was analyzed using SPSS software. The findings indicated that the most dominant learning style among technical students is Doer. The findings also depict none of the students perceived their thinking skills’ levels to be high. Only four Marzano HOTS, namely comparing, inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning and investigation are rated at the moderate level. On contrary, nine Marzano HOTS are rated as low. The Cramer V analysis showed that there is a very low relationship between Kolb Learning Styles and the level of 13 Marzano HOTS. Besides that, the findings revealed that there is statistically significant difference in Kolb Learning Styles on the level of 13 Marzano HOTS. However, only two Marzano HOTS are significant difference in Kolb Learning Styles. Therefore, the identification of learner's learning styles could serve as initial guide in developing more effective and conducive teaching-learning environment for learning HOTS.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences - Volume 204, 24 August 2015, Pages 143-152