کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1110112 1488364 2015 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A Conceptual Framework for Mechatronics Curriculum Using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی علوم انسانی و هنر هنر و علوم انسانی (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
A Conceptual Framework for Mechatronics Curriculum Using Stufflebeam CIPP Evaluation Model
چکیده انگلیسی

Evaluation means a study that has been established and implemented to help the observer to assess the value and merit of an object. This evaluation can be performed on any activities that have the aim. The model also visualize a conceptual representation of an activity about their relationship between the various elements that been involved in such activities. By using the model, assessment activities can be conducted completely and significant. The researcher choose Stufflebeam CIPP evaluation model because of its effectiveness to get results of formative and summative, to find the decision, and also problem solving ability. In this paper, the author is trying to define the stage dimensional and elements context, input, process and product in Mechatronics curriculum implementation. The method that been used are the analysis of documents, with reference of previous studies. Reviewing of literature can be used as a guide to researchers. As a results, the researchers will identify the aspects of the study based on the dimensions of context, input, process and product. Conceptual framework was intended to be used in the implementation of the evaluation study of Diploma in Mechatronic Engineering in polytechnic toward the needs of industry in Malaysia. In fact, this aspect of the study can be used to assess the Mechatronics program in terms of overall performance and significant. Stufflebeam CIPP evaluation model been used and designed not only to prove a decision but acts as a fixer where the information can be used as a guide for designing a program.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences - Volume 195, 3 July 2015, Pages 844-849