Which gauge matters?

I present a new interpretation of the Aharonov–Bohm by identifying an overlooked physical field: the current field. The interpretation is non-arbitrary, completely local, deterministic, and separable. I then consider the connection between theoretical methodology and fundamental ontology by considering Earman's call to consider gauge matters. I conclude that we should be clear about which gauge matters we consider, and question the tight connection he draws between the methodological and ontological roles of gauge fields.