کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1176549 961858 2007 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Inaccuracies in selected ion monitoring determination of isotope ratios obviated by profile acquisition: nucleotide 18O/16O measurements
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه شیمی شیمی آنالیزی یا شیمی تجزیه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Inaccuracies in selected ion monitoring determination of isotope ratios obviated by profile acquisition: nucleotide 18O/16O measurements
چکیده انگلیسی

Precise and accurate measurements of isotopologue distributions (IDs) in biological molecules are needed for determination of isotope effects, quantitation by isotope dilution, and quantification of isotope tracers employed in both metabolic and biophysical studies.While single ion monitoring (SIM) yields significantly greater sensitivity and signal/noise than profile-mode acquisitions, we show that small changes in the SIM window width and/or center can alter experimentally determined isotope ratios by up to 5%, resulting in significant inaccuracies. This inaccuracy is attributed to mass granularity, the differential distribution of digital data points across the m/z ranges sampled by SIM. Acquiring data in the profile mode and fitting the data to an equation describing a series of equally spaced and identically shaped peaks eliminates the inaccuracies associated with mass granularity with minimal loss of precision. Additionally a method of using the complete ID profile data that inherently corrects for “spillover” and for the natural-abundance ID has been used to determine 18O/16O ratios for 5′,3′-guanosine bis-[18O1]phosphate and TM[18O1]P with precisions of ∼0.005. The analysis protocol is also applied to quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry using [2-18O] arabinouridine and 3′-UM[18O1]P which enhances signal/noise and minimizes concerns for background contamination.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Analytical Biochemistry - Volume 367, Issue 1, 1 August 2007, Pages 28–39
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,