کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1395324 | 1501204 | 2009 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
Despite clinical importance of leishmaniasis, an infectious disease that affects 12 thousand million people in 88 countries, the treatment is still unsatisfactory due to its limited efficacy, cost expensive and undesirable side effects. Aiming to develop new antileishmanial lead compounds, we used a rational approach to synthesize a new set of sulfonamide 4-methoxychalcone derivatives (3a–3i) and evaluate the sulfonamide and methoxy moieties as promising adding-groups to chalcones. For that purpose we tested this new set against Leishmania braziliensis promastigotes and intracellular amastigotes and determined its cell toxicity profile. Interestingly all compounds presented a concentration-dependent antileishmanial profile and the benzylamino derivative (3i) showed a biological activity better than pentamidine. None of these compounds affected Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes, which suggests a specific antileishmanial profile. The structure–activity analysis of these sulfonamide 4-methoxychalcone derivatives pointed the molecular volume, the HOMO density concentrated in the chalcone moiety and the conformational structure of the compounds as important structural and stereoelectronic features for the antileishmanial activity. In addition, these compounds also fulfilled Lipinski rule of 5 and presented druglikeness similar to antileishmanial drugs. Altogether these results point the sulfonamide 4-methoxychalcone derivatives as potential lead compounds for designing new candidates for leishmaniasis treatment.
We performed the design, synthesis, and the structure–activity relationship studies of 10 sulfonamide 4-methoxychalcone derivatives and biologically and theoretically evaluated them against Leishmania braziliensis strain pointing the benzylamine derivative as a lead compound for antiparasites' development.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry - Volume 44, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 755–763