کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1398024 | 1501205 | 2009 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict for CCR5 binding affinity of substituted 1-(3,3-diphenylpropyl)-piperidinyl amides and ureas using linear free energy relationship (LFER). Eight molecular descriptors selected by the heuristic method (HM) in CODESSA were used as inputs to perform multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector machine (SVM) and projection pursuit regression (PPR) studies. Compared with MLR model, the SVM and PPR models give better results with the predicted correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.867 and 0.834 and the squared standard error (s2) of 0.095 and 0.119 for the training set and R2R2 of 0.732 and 0.726 and s2s2 of 0.210 and 0.207 for the test set, respectively. It indicates that the SVM and PPR approaches are more adapted to the set of molecules we studied. In addition, methods used in this paper are simple, practical and effective for chemists to predict the human CCR5 chemokine receptor.
Definition of substituted 1-(3,3-diphenylpropyl)-piperidinyl amides and ureas. R1-position (showing limited substitution pattern), X position (showing limited structural variations), and the R2, R3, R4 positions of the phenyl rings (showing diverse substitution pattern).Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry - Volume 44, Issue 1, January 2009, Pages 25–34