کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1457741 | 989276 | 2006 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Alteration of alkali reactive aggregates autoclaved in different alkali solutions and application to alkali–aggregate reaction in concrete: (I) Alteration of alkali reactive aggregates in alkali solutions Alteration of alkali reactive aggregates autoclaved in different alkali solutions and application to alkali–aggregate reaction in concrete: (I) Alteration of alkali reactive aggregates in alkali solutions](/preview/png/1457741.png)
Surface alteration of typical aggregates with alkali–silica reactivity and alkali–carbonate reactivity, i.e. Spratt limestone (SL) and Pittsburg dolomitic limestone (PL), were studied by XRD and SEM/EDS after autoclaving in KOH, NaOH and LiOH solutions at 150 °C for 150 h. The results indicate that: (1) NaOH shows the strongest attack on both ASR and ACR aggregates, the weakest attack is with LiOH. For both aggregates autoclaved in different alkali media, the crystalline degree, morphology and distribution of products are quite different. More crystalline products are formed on rock surfaces in KOH than that in NaOH solution, while almost no amorphous product is formed in LiOH solution; (2) in addition to dedolomitization of PL in KOH, NaOH and LiOH solutions, cryptocrystalline quartz in PL involves in reaction with alkaline solution and forms typical alkali–silica product in NaOH and KOH solutions, but forms lithium silicate (Li2SiO3) in LiOH solution; (3) in addition to massive alkali–silica product formed in SL autoclaved in different alkaline solutions, a small amount of dolomite existing in SL may simultaneously dedolomitize and possibly contribute to expansion; (4) it is promising to use the duplex effect of LiOH on ASR and ACR to distinguish the alkali–silica reactivity and alkali–carbonate reactivity of aggregate when both ASR and ACR might coexist.
Journal: Cement and Concrete Research - Volume 36, Issue 6, June 2006, Pages 1176–1190