Prospects of using different clad materials in a material test research reactor – Part 2 – The reactivity feedback coefficients

The reactivity feedback coefficients of a material test research reactor using stainless steel-316 and zircaloy-4 as clad were calculated. For this purpose, the aluminum clad of an MTR was replaced with stainless steel-316 and zircaloy-4. Calculations were carried out to find the fuel temperature reactivity feedback coefficient, clad temperature reactivity feedback coefficient, moderator temperature reactivity feedback coefficient and moderator density reactivity feedback coefficient. Nuclear reactor analysis codes including WIMS-D4 and CITATION were employed to carry out these calculations. It is observed that the average values of fuel temperature reactivity feedback coefficient, moderator temperature reactivity coefficient and moderator density reactivity coefficient from 38 °C to 50 °C, at the beginning of life, were maximum in magnitude for stainless steel-316 cladded fuel, followed by aluminum and least for the zircaloy-4 cladded fuel. The fuel temperature feedback coefficient increased in magnitude by 47.37% for stainless steel-316 and decreased by 4.72% for zircaloy-4 clad. The moderator temperature feedback coefficient increased in magnitude by 60.41% for stainless steel-316 and decreased by 3.03% for zircaloy-4 clad, while the moderator density feedback coefficient showed an increase in magnitude of 59.18% for stainless steel-316 and a decrease of 7.63% for zircaloy-4 clad. Zircaloy-4 gave a positive value for clad temperature feedback coefficient, while the others two did not have any clad temperature feedback coefficient.