کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
1914808 1535175 2009 5 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Gross-total hematoma removal of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhages: A long-term follow-up
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی سالمندی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Gross-total hematoma removal of hypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhages: A long-term follow-up
چکیده انگلیسی

Background and purposeHypertensive basal ganglia hemorrhage (HBGH) accounts for 35%–44% of cases of hypertensive intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), which is one of the most devastating forms of cerebrovascular disease. In this study, intracerebral hematoma was evacuated with a burr hole craniectomy. The relationships of residue hematoma volume to brain edema, inflammation factors and the long-term prognosis of HBGH patients were studied.MethodsOne hundred and seventy-six patients with HBGH were randomly divided into gross-total removal of hematoma (GTRH) and sub-total removal of hematoma (STRH) groups. The pre-operative and post-operative data of the patients in the two groups were compared. The pre-operative data included age, sex, hematoma volume, time from the ictus to the operation, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, and the European Stroke Scale (ESS) scores. The post-operative information included edema grade, level of thromboxane B2 (TXB2), 6-keto-prostaglandin F1ɑ (6-K-PGF1ɑ), tumor necrosis factor-ɑ (TNF-ɑ) and endothelin (ET) in hematoma drainage or cerebral spinal fluid (CSF), ESS and Barthel Index (BI).ResultsThere was no statistical difference between the two groups (P > 0.05) in the pre-operative data. The levels of TXB2, 6-K-PGF1ɑ, TNF-ɑ and ET in the GTRH group were significantly lower than those in the STRH group at different post-operative times. The ESS in the GTRH group increased rapidly after the operation and was higher than that in the STRH group. There was a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The post-operative CT scan at different times showed that the brain edema grades were better in the GTRH group than in the STRH group. The BI was higher in the GTRH group than in the STRH group (P < 0.05).ConclusionsGTRH is an effective method to decrease ICH-induced injury to brain tissue. Such effect is related to decreased perihematomal edema formation and secondary injury by coagulation end products activated inflammatory cascade.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the Neurological Sciences - Volume 287, Issues 1–2, 15 December 2009, Pages 100–104
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,