کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2042552 1073202 2013 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
N-Terminal Domains in Two-Domain Proteins Are Biased to Be Shorter and Predicted to Fold Faster Than Their C-Terminal Counterparts
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک (عمومی)
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
N-Terminal Domains in Two-Domain Proteins Are Biased to Be Shorter and Predicted to Fold Faster Than Their C-Terminal Counterparts
چکیده انگلیسی


• Bias for shorter N- versus C-terminal domains in two-domain proteins
• Predicted faster folding of N- versus C-terminal domains in two-domain proteins
• Two-domain proteins with a shorter N-terminal domain are more abundant
• Two-domain proteins with faster-folding N-terminal domains may misfold less

SummaryComputational analysis of proteomes in all kingdoms of life reveals a strong tendency for N-terminal domains in two-domain proteins to have shorter sequences than their neighboring C-terminal domains. Given that folding rates are affected by chain length, we asked whether the tendency for N-terminal domains to be shorter than their neighboring C-terminal domains reflects selection for faster-folding N-terminal domains. Calculations of absolute contact order, another predictor of folding rate, provide additional evidence that N-terminal domains tend to fold faster than their neighboring C-terminal domains. A possible explanation for this bias, which is more pronounced in prokaryotes than in eukaryotes, is that faster folding of N-terminal domains reduces the risk for protein aggregation during folding by preventing formation of nonnative interdomain interactions. This explanation is supported by our finding that two-domain proteins with a shorter N-terminal domain are much more abundant than those with a shorter C-terminal domain.

Graphical AbstractFigure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: - Volume 3, Issue 4, 25 April 2013, Pages 1051–1056
نویسندگان
, , ,