کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2105496 1546317 2011 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Reduced Late Mortality Risk Contributes to Similar Survival after Double-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation Compared with Related and Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Reduced Late Mortality Risk Contributes to Similar Survival after Double-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation Compared with Related and Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
چکیده انگلیسی

Cord blood transplantation (CB-T) is increasingly used as a treatment alternative for hematologic malignancies. However, how CB-T compares to related (RD-T) and unrelated donor transplantation (URD-T) is not established. We compared survival of 75 double-unit CB-T, 108 RD-T, and 184 URD-T recipients who received transplants over the same period for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. Patients had similar ages and disease risk, and a similar percentage had acute leukemia. The incidence of day 180 transplant-related mortality (TRM) of 21% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12-31) after CB-T was higher than that of RD-T recipients. However, this was compensated for by a low risk of TRM after day 180, and a relatively low incidence of relapse. Hence, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 55% (95% CI: 45-68) after CB-T was similar to that after RD-T or URD-T (P = .573). In multivariate analysis, donor source had no influence on PFS, with the only significant factors being recipient age and disease risk. In a subanalysis of 201 patients with acute leukemia, CB-T, RD-T, and URD-T recipients also had similar 2-year disease-free survival (P = .482). These data provide strong support for the further investigation of double-unit CB grafts as an alternative hematopoietic stem cell source.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: - Volume 17, Issue 9, September 2011, Pages 1316–1326
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,