کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2105795 1546376 2007 12 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Utility of Single versus Tandem Autotransplants for Advanced Testes/Germ Cell Cancer: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Utility of Single versus Tandem Autotransplants for Advanced Testes/Germ Cell Cancer: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) Analysis
چکیده انگلیسی

Tandem autotransplants are used to treat advanced testis cancer patients but their value compared to a single autotransplant is unknown. To evaluate the results of autotransplant in relapsed testicular/germ cell cancer, data from 300 patients undergoing autotransplants 1989-2002 were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. We compared results for those patients intended to undergo tandem autotransplant procedures (N = 102) versus patients in whom a second autotransplant was not planned (N = 198). Five-year survival probability was 35% (95% confidence interval = 25%-46%) in the planned tandem transplant cohort compared to 42% (35%-49%) in the group not planned to have a second transplant (P = .29). Probability of progression-free survival at 5 years for these cohorts was 34% (25%-44%) and 38% (31%-45%), respectively (P = .50). The planned tandem autotransplant cohort had significantly more advanced disease at diagnosis and greater likelihood of cisplatin resistance. Patients intended to receive tandem transplants had a lower treatment-related mortality at 1 year (3% versus 10%, P = .02). Using propensity score analysis the planned tandem autotransplant cohort had significantly lower treatment-related mortality (P = .044) but no different risk of relapse (P = .541) compared to the planned single transplant cohort. Tandem autotransplants for testicular cancer are associated with less treatment-related mortality than a planned single transplant, with no differences in disease-related outcomes or overall survival at 3 years. Patient selection bias for either transplant approach, however, may affect the results of this observational study; a randomized trial is needed to determine which approach, if either, is better.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: - Volume 13, Issue 7, July 2007, Pages 778–789
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,