کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2141630 1088293 2012 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of pemetrexed plus cisplatin with other first-line doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A combined analysis of three phase 3 trials
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Comparison of pemetrexed plus cisplatin with other first-line doublets in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A combined analysis of three phase 3 trials
چکیده انگلیسی

IntroductionIn a first-line study of advanced NSCLC, pemetrexed–cisplatin was more effective among patients with adenocarcinoma and large-cell carcinoma compared with gemcitabine–cisplatin (median survival of 11.8 versus 10.4 months, P = .005), while survival with pemetrexed–cisplatin was shorter than with gemcitabine–cisplatin in patients with squamous cell carcinoma. The comparability of pemetrexed–cisplatin to other commonly used regimens within histology subgroups needs to be explored.MethodsThis retrospective analysis combined the patient-level data from three phase 3 randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of different third generation platinum- and non-platinum based doublets. Unadjusted median survival times and Cox covariate-adjusted treatment hazard ratio (HR) estimates were calculated. Overall results and subgroups by histological type were reported.ResultsThis combined analysis consisted of 3467 patients. In the overall analysis, adjusted HRs favored pemetrexed (HR <1.0) to each of the other 5 regimens, though none of these HRs were statistically significant. Among patients with non-squamous histology, pemetrexed–cisplatin produced favorable HRs to each of the other regimens, achieving statistical significance when compared with vinorelbine–cisplatin (HR = 0.67; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.50, 0.91) and gemcitabine–cisplatin (HR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.97). Among patients with squamous histology, 4 of the 5 comparison regimens produced favorable HRs (HR >1.0) when compared with pemetrexed–cisplatin, with only the comparison with gemcitabine–cisplatin achieving statistical significance (HR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.51).ConclusionIn the absence of randomized clinical trial data comparing pemetrexed–cisplatin to commonly used doublets in advanced NSCLC other than gemcitabine–cisplatin, this combined analysis of multiple trials provides estimates for such comparisons.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Lung Cancer - Volume 76, Issue 2, May 2012, Pages 222–227
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,