The stability of methyl-, ethyl- and fluoroethylesters against carboxylesterases in vitro: there is no difference

IntroductionCarboxylesterases (CES) play a very important role in the hydrophilic biotransformation of a huge number of structurally diverse drugs and especially play a leading part in the catabolic pathway of carboxylesters or thioesters. Hence, the aim of the present study was the comparison of the in vitro stability of methyl- and ethylesters with fluoroethylesters.MethodsWe incubated methyl 3β-(4-iodophenyl)tropane-2β-carboxylate (β-CIT)/2-fluoroethyl 3β-(4-iodophenyl)tropane-2β-carboxylate (FE@CIT), methyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (MTO)/ethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (ETO)/2-fluoroethyl 1-(1-phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (FETO), ethyl 8-fluoro-5-methyl-6-oxo-5,6-dihydro-4H-benzo-[f]imidazo[1,5-a]-[1,4]diazepine-3-carboxylate (FMZ)/2-fluoroethyl 8-fluoro-5-methyl-6-oxo-5,6-dihydro-4H-benzo-[f]imidazo[1,5-a]-[1,4]diazepine-3-carboxylate (FFMZ), methyl 1-phenylethyl-4-(N-propanoylanilino)piperidine-4-carboxylate (CFN)/2-fluoroethyl 1-phenylethyl-4-(N-propanoylanilino)piperidine-4-carboxylate (FE@CFN) and methyl 2,4-diethyl-3-methylsulfanylcarbonyl-6-phenylpyridine-5-carboxylate [(Me)2@SUPPY]/2-fluorethyl 2,4-diethyl-3-ethylsulfanylcarbonyl-6-phenylpyridine-5-carboxylate (FE@SUPPY) under physiological conditions. The enzymatic reactions were stopped at different time points and analyzed by a standard protocol.ResultsThe Michaelis–Menten constants (KM) and limiting velocities (Vmax) are comparable. The statistical KM values were as follows: β-CIT/FE@CIT, P>.05; MTO/FETO, P>.06; ETO/FETO, P>.09; FMZ/FFMZ, P>.05; CFN/FE@CFN, P>.9; (Me)2@SUPPY/FE@SUPPY, P>.07.ConclusionWe found no statistical difference in stability against CES in vitro. These findings support the strategy to translate C-11-methyl-/ethylesters into their longer-lived F-18-fluoroethyl analogues.