کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2426976 | 1105935 | 2012 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Queens defense by workers in the highly polygynous ant Crematogaster pygmaea (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae) Queens defense by workers in the highly polygynous ant Crematogaster pygmaea (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae)](/preview/png/2426976.png)
Some aspects of the biology of Crematogaster pygmaea, a highly polydomous and polygynous ant, are more commonly found in monogynous species. One such characteristic is the high attractiveness of its queens. In this study, this attractiveness was assessed under varying experimental conditions to investigate the factors responsible for its expression and variation, and to identify the nature of queen attractiveness. It was shown (1) that C. pygmaea queens are highly attractive to the workers that cluster on and around them (retinue), (2) that the attractiveness of C. pygmaea queens is context-dependent, i.e., it increases with increasing degree of potential danger to the queen, (3) that the attractiveness signal of C. pygmaea queens is chemically based, and (4) that this signal is persistent and apparently not colony-specific. The proposed hypothesis is that the C. pygmaea queens constantly release an attractiveness signal that is “read” by the workers, in a dependent way linked to the context, and that the main function of this attractiveness is to protect queens. This protection would have a high adaptive value in the context of the social structure and the reproductive strategies in C. pygmaea.
► The queens of the polygynous ant Crematogaster pygmaea are highly attractive to workers.
► This attractiveness is based on chemical signals that are persistent and not colony-specific.
► The C. pygmaea workers “read” the queen-attractiveness signals in a dependent way linked to the degree of danger to the queen.
► The main function of this attractiveness is queens’ protection.
Journal: Behavioural Processes - Volume 91, Issue 3, November 2012, Pages 282–290