Interrupting timing in interval production and discrimination: Similarities and differences

Interruptions in human timing have been studied in the last few years using temporal production and discrimination tasks. Expecting a break shortened perceived duration in both paradigms but manipulating break duration affected time production only, suggesting that preparatory processes might not take place in time discrimination. In time production, using cues revealed that providing information about the break may modulate the effect of break expectancy. For example, time was perceived as shorter when a break was expected in trials with no breaks, but forewarning participants of the break absence with a cue almost abolished the effect. In the present experiment, a tone was classified as “short” or “long” in a discrimination task. Location and duration of breaks were varied and cues were provided in some trials with no breaks. Results showed an effect of break expectancy: perceived duration shortened with increasing pre-break duration. Reducing expectancy with cues in uninterrupted tones decreased the proportion of “short” responses in long-tone trials, but not in short-tone trials. As in previous discrimination experiments, perceived duration was unaffected by varying break duration. Similarities and differences in results as well as in their interpretation when breaks are used in time production and time discrimination tasks are discussed.