Impediments to energy-efficient ventilation of German dwellings: A case study in Aachen

Manual ventilation of dwellings in winter consumes excess heating energy, as cold outdoor air replaces warm indoor air. The German government promotes ‘shock-ventilation’ (Stoßlüften), where all windows are opened simultaneously, fully and briefly, to minimise energy wastage. However, the predominant design of windows in Germany's housing stock mitigates against this strategy, as these windows open inwards while their indoor ledges provide ideal storage for pot-plants and other objects, blocking normal opening. An alternative window setting, long periods of trickle-ventilation, can consume up to 20 times as much energy as shock-ventilation. This paper reports a pilot study of household ventilation capabilities and practices in the German municipality of Aachen. A statistical analysis indicates 29% of dwellings have sufficiently unimpeded windows to facilitate shock-ventilation, while householder interviews reveal reasons for reliance on trickle-ventilation, including convenience and underestimation of its energy consumption. Analysis of results using ‘social practice theory’ suggests three possible policy interventions to improve energy-efficiency of ventilation. The results suggest the need for a nationwide study to quantify energy wastage through mismanaged ventilation, not least because of its possible cost to the country, of several billion Euros annually, and the millions of tonnes of CO2 emissions it most likely causes.

► Energy-efficient ventilation needs brief, full, simultaneous window opening.
► In Germany it is inhibited by window-ledge displays, as windows open inwards.
► A pilot study in Aachen reveals 70% of windows cannot be easily opened.
► Householder interviews reveal that most ventilation is highly inefficient.
► Analysis of results leads to suggestions for policy intervention.