کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2646344 | 1138849 | 2008 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Comparison of Low Fidelity Simulation Learning Strategy With Traditional Lecture Comparison of Low Fidelity Simulation Learning Strategy With Traditional Lecture](/preview/png/2646344.png)
BackgroundA study was conducted to compare low-fidelity simulation with traditional lecture on medication administration.MethodA randomized two-group experimental design was used. In all, 43 associate degree nursing students at a Midwestern university were recruited for the study. The traditional method included lecture. The simulation method included lecture and a CD-ROM.Results and ConclusionsStatistical significance was reached (p < .05) for Research Question 1 — Are there significant differences between the two groups' pretest and posttest scores?: Both groups' mean scores improved. No significant difference was reached for Research Question 2 — Are there significant differences in retention between the two groups as measured by pretest, Posttest 1, and Posttest 2 scores?: The groups' mean scores on Posttest 2 were similar. Replication and further study on maximizing use of low-fidelity strategies is recommended.
Journal: Clinical Simulation in Nursing - Volume 4, Issue 2, July 2008, Pages e15–e18