کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2789114 1154471 2013 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The efficacy of cefazolin plus macrolide (erythromycin or clarithromycin) versus cefazolin alone in neonatal morbidity and placental inflammation for women with preterm premature rupture of membranes
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی زیست شناسی تکاملی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The efficacy of cefazolin plus macrolide (erythromycin or clarithromycin) versus cefazolin alone in neonatal morbidity and placental inflammation for women with preterm premature rupture of membranes
چکیده انگلیسی

IntroductionAlthough the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is recommended to prolong pregnancy and decrease short-term neonatal complications, the optimal regimen remains undetermined. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cefazolin plus macrolide (erythromycin or clarithromycin) versus cefazolin alone in reducing neonatal morbidity and placental inflammation for women with PPROM.MethodsThis prospective study included singleton pregnancies with PPROM (23–33 weeks gestation). The primary outcome was neonatal composite morbidity and the secondary outcomes were the incidence of abnormal brain sonography and infant neurological outcome at one year of age. The presence and the stage of acute histological chorioamnionitis and funisitis were also reviewed blinded to all clinical information.Results102 women were randomly assigned to cefazolin (n = 35), cefazolin plus erythromycin (n = 31), or cefazolin plus clarithromycin (n = 36). The neonatal composite morbidity, the incidence of abnormal brain sonography, and infant neurological outcome at one year of age were similar between the comparison treatments (combination of cefazolin plus erythromycin or clarithromycin) and cefazolin. However, the presence and stage of histological funisitis showed significant difference between cefazolin plus clarithromycin versus cefazolin alone (p = 0.023).DiscussionThis study is the first clinical trial of the use of cefazolin with either clarithromycin or erythromycin compared to cefazolin alone in the management of PPROM in which the primary and secondary analyses showed no difference among the three antibiotic regimens. The only noted difference was from a lesser degree of histological funisitis associated with clarithromycin exposure.ConclusionOur data suggests that clarithromycin may be an alternative worth considering with potentially beneficial effects compared to erythromycin in PPROM.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Placenta - Volume 34, Issue 4, April 2013, Pages 346–352
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,