Simulation of scattered fields: Some guidelines for the equivalent source method

Three different approaches of the equivalent source method for simulating scattered fields are compared: two of them deal with monopole sets, the other with multipole expansions. In the first monopole approach, the sources have fixed positions given by specific rules, while in the second one (ESGA), the optimal positions are determined via a genetic algorithm. The ‘pros and cons’ of each of these approaches are discussed with the aim of providing practical guidelines for the user. It is shown that while both monopole techniques furnish quite good pressure field reconstructions with simple source arrangements, ESGA requires a number of monopoles significantly smaller and, with equal number of sources, yields a better precision. As for the multipole technique, the main advantage is that in principle any precision can be reached, provided the source order is sufficiently high. On the other hand, the results point out that the lack of rules for determining the proper multipole order necessary for a desired precision may constitute a handicap for the user.