کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
32103 | 44900 | 2013 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Binding and diffusion affect the penetration of targeted nanoparticles in tumors.
• Simulations show many nanoparticle formulations accumulate in cells near vessels.
• Shielding prevents nanoparticles from binding until they diffuse deep in tissue.
• Shielding strategy is generalizable to many nanoparticles and tumor scenarios.
• Time or space-dependent binding enables engineered nanoparticle tissue distributions.
SummaryTargeted nanoparticles are increasingly being engineered for the treatment of cancer. By design, they can passively accumulate in tumors, selectively bind to targets in their environment, and deliver localized treatments. However, the penetration of targeted nanoparticles deep into tissue can be hindered by their slow diffusion and a high binding affinity. As a result, they often localize to areas around the vessels from which they extravasate, never reaching the deep-seeded tumor cells, thereby limiting their efficacy. To increase tissue penetration and cellular accumulation, we propose generalizable guidelines for nanoparticle design and validate them using two different computer models that capture the potency, motion, binding kinetics, and cellular internalization of targeted nanoparticles in a section of tumor tissue. One strategy that emerged from the models was delaying nanoparticle binding until after the nanoparticles have had time to diffuse deep into the tissue. Results show that nanoparticles that are designed according to these guidelines do not require fine-tuning of their kinetics or size and can be administered in lower doses than classical targeted nanoparticles for a desired tissue penetration in a large variety of tumor scenarios. In the future, similar models could serve as a testbed to explore engineered tissue-distributions that arise when large numbers of nanoparticles interact in a tumor environment.
Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (416 K)Download as PowerPoint slide
Journal: - Volume 8, Issue 6, December 2013, Pages 566–576