Assessing the importance of individual habitat patches as irreplaceable connecting elements: An analysis of simulated and real landscape data

Habitat loss and fragmentation are considered to be severe threats to biodiversity, and maintaining natural levels of landscape connectivity may be one of the best responses to these issues. Graph-based habitat availability (reachability) metrics have been shown to be an appropriate method for a multifaceted but coherent landscape connectivity assessment. These metrics can be partitioned into three commensurate fractions (intra, flux, connector) that quantify the different ways in which habitat patches contribute to the overall landscape connectivity and habitat availability. In particular, the connector fraction measures the contribution of patches to the connectivity between other habitat areas as irreplaceable connecting elements or stepping stones. Because many conservation efforts and initiatives are focused on conserving or restoring corridors and other linkages between habitat areas, it is critical to understand more thoroughly the conditions under which investing in these connecting elements is an efficient management strategy. For this purpose, we analysed the contribution of the connector fraction in different simulated habitat patterns under different levels of habitat amount and fragmentation and in natural habitats for endangered forest bird species in Catalonia (Spain). We show that a prominent role of individual stepping stone patches as irreplaceable providers of habitat connectivity and availability arises only under a relatively narrow set of conditions, characterised by low habitat amount, high habitat fragmentation and modest to intermediate species dispersal abilities. We suggest that to support connectivity-related investments, it is necessary to focus on those few species or dispersal distance ranges that are likely to be both most dependent on and most benefited by the conservation or restoration of stepping stone patches. We conclude that the total amount of reachable habitat for a particular species is rarely determined by the contribution of individual connectors as the only dominant factor. Therefore, conservationists should be cautious not to overemphasise the importance of connectivity investments and to balance them with other conservation alternatives and strategies to promote species conservation in heterogeneous landscapes.

► Combining simulated and real-world data provided detailed insights into the importance of individual connectors in habitat landscape networks.
► A prominent role of irreplaceable connectivity providers only arose in a narrow set of conditions.
► The use of thresholds based solely on habitat amount to support connectivity-related investments is not advocated.
► Conservationists should be cautious not to overemphasise the importance of connecting elements.