A test of the hierarchical model of habitat selection using eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus c. catenatus)

Understanding the process animals follow to select habitat, rather than just documenting the habitat they use, will improve our ability to predict how the animals use habitat in other locations and how they will respond to changes in habitat. Animals are usually assumed to select habitats hierarchically, preferentially using specific macrohabitats at a landscape scale and specific microhabitats within the preferred macrohabitats. We used four years of telemetry data from 34 individuals to test this hierarchical model of habitat selection with eastern massasauga rattlesnakes (Sistrurus c. catenatus) in Ontario. Snakes were selective at the microhabitat scale, preferentially using locations with closer retreat sites and shrubs than random. Gravid females were most selective, using sites with more rock cover and less canopy closure than sites used by males and nongravid females. Snakes preferred forested habitats for hibernation and steadily increased their use of open, wetland, and edge habitats to a peak in mid-summer. Landscape-scale habitat preferences were generally mild and could be explained by the relative availability of suitable microhabitat within habitats, suggesting habitat selection was primarily driven by microhabitat preferences. The lack of selectivity at the landscape scale may be a consequence of fine-grained differences between habitats that allow massasauga rattlesnakes to find suitable microhabitats in all available macrohabitats. For species that select habitat primarily at the microhabitat scale (e.g., the rattlesnakes we studied), landscape-scale modeling of habitat use will only be effective to the extent habitats reflect the availability of suitable microhabitat within.