Effect of reduced tillage systems on earthworm communities in a 6-year organic rotation

Chisel plough or no-till practises are clearly attributed to sustainable farming for the support of soil organisms and soil biological functioning. However, in organic farming these techniques are only applied to a very small extent since there is a need for cultivation to control weeds. In organic farming it is important to develop and establish less destructive soil tillage practises to benefit from the support of soil organisms, especially from ecosystem engineers like earthworms. In this study three tillage systems were compared on a silty, loess' derived soil in a 6 crop rotation. The tillage systems established were: (1) “ecomat” shallow (10 cm) inversive ploughing; (2) a ridge culture system; and (3) conventional tillage (inversion tillage) down to 30 cm. In fall 2005, three years after establishment of the field plots earthworm communities were investigated using formalin extraction. In total 6 species were detected. The earthworm abundance was low, ranging from 0 to 84 individuals m−2. Shallow ploughing using the “ecomat” technique was not different than conventional ploughing in its effects on earthworm populations, while the ridge culture system was significantly reduced in earthworm numbers and biomass compared to conventional ploughing. We conclude that both “ecomat” and “ridge culture” do not support earthworms and significantly reduce earthworm densities. The reductions in tillage depth alone are not effective for improving the habitat quality for earthworms in soil.