Trophic transfer of trace metals: Subcellular compartmentalisation in bivalve prey and comparative assimilation efficiencies of two invertebrate predators

We test the hypothesis that accumulated metal in prey that is trophically available to one predator is not necessarily equally trophically available to another predator feeding on the same prey, given the variability between invertebrate digestive systems. We provided two predators, the neogastropod mollusc Hinia reticulata and the palaemonid decapod crustacean Palaemonetes varians, with the digestive glands and adductor muscles of four bivalves radiolabelled with Zn, Cd or Ag. The bivalves (the mussel Mytilus edulis, the clam Ruditapes philippinarum, the scallop Aequipecten opercularis, the oyster Crassostrea gigas) have different metal accumulation patterns with differential dependence on soluble and insoluble detoxification, as confirmed by fractionation of the prey tissues. We found no consistent significant difference between the AE of the two predators for the three trace metals accumulated in the same prey tissues. There were no significant correlations for either predator between percentages of metal in soluble form (or soluble form with organelle-associated metal) and percentage AE for any of the three metals, allowing the conclusion that both predators are assimilating each metal from more than the soluble and organelle-associated metal fractions. For neither predator did an increased percentage of Zn in the form of metal rich granules (MRG) affect its Zn AE, but increases in the percentages of both Cd and Ag bound to MRG decreased the AE of the relevant metal in P. varians but not H. reticulata. Thus the Cd and Ag in some Cd-rich and Ag-rich granules in the bivalve tissues are not as trophically available to P. varians as they are to H. reticulata. This interspecific difference confirms that the neogastropod has the stronger digestive and assimilative powers involving Cd and Ag bound in prey than the palaemonid decapod.