Mobile Learning (M-Learning) adoption in the Middle East: Lessons learned from the educationally advanced countries

• M-Learning adoption is affected by national level initiatives.
• M-Learning can be implemented well by public and private partnership.
• M-Learning in the Middle East is require awareness, training, and motivation.
• Experience of educationally advanced countries can be used to tackle problem of M-Learning adoption in educationally less developed countries.

The integration of mobile devices in the educational system presents enormous opportunities stretching from improved efficiency to accessibility of education to communities living in remote areas. The last decade has seen emergence of a new economy called Knowledge Economy, a fusion of globalization and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). Educationally advanced countries such as South Korea, USA, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Malaysia, European Union and Australia are using mobile devices in the educational sectors. These countries have been found promoting Mobile Learning (M-Learning) as a matter of national policies. They have accommodated E-Learning and M-Learning in their traditional learning systems. However most of the Middle East countries are still out of race and facing number of challenges in M-Learning adoption. A critical review of educationally advanced countries suggests that adoption of M-Learning is influenced by country specific as well as individual constraints. As a consequence five important lessons have been drawn from these countries, national level initiatives, public and private partnership, characteristics of learners and cultural norms, M-Learning infrastructure, and awareness. This paper is intended to help policymakers of the educationally less advanced countries to overcome the challenges of M-Learning, following the footsteps of educationally advanced countries. The review concludes with the discussion of five lessons in the context of the Middle East, assigning priority the most important being the national level objective, followed by M-Learning awareness, partnership between public and private entities. Also learners’ characteristics and cultural norms, M-Learning infrastructure, policymakers must evaluate when making decisions about M-Learning adoption.