کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
476601 | 1446011 | 2015 | 16 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We argue that business schools have difficulty in tackling real world problems.
• We present a model of the factors generating this problem.
• We make recommendations for improving the situation.
• These include critical realism, multimethodology, transdisciplinarity and ethics.
• Possibilities for bringing about change are considered.
The world faces major problems, not least climate change and the financial crisis, and business schools have been criticised for their failure to help address these issues and, in the case of the financial meltdown, for being causally implicated in it. In this paper we begin by describing the extent of what has been called the rigour/relevance debate. We then diagnose the nature of the problem in terms of historical, structural and contextual mechanisms that initiated and now sustain an inability of business schools to engage with real-world issues. We then propose a combination of measures, which mutually reinforce each other, that are necessary to break into this vicious circle – critical realism as an underpinning philosophy that supports and embodies the next points; holism and transdisciplinarity; multimethodology (mixed-methods research); and a critical and ethical-committed stance. OR and management science have much to contribute in terms of both powerful analytical methods and problem structuring methods.
Journal: European Journal of Operational Research - Volume 242, Issue 1, 1 April 2015, Pages 316–331