کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
4950679 | 1364298 | 2017 | 24 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Rethinking specificity in defeasible reasoning and its effect in argument reinstatement
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ویژگی انتقادی در استدلال قابل قبول و تأثیر آن بر بازنویسی استدلال
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
سیستم های استدلال اختصاصی، بازگرداندن شکست دادن حکم،
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه
مهندسی کامپیوتر
نظریه محاسباتی و ریاضیات
چکیده انگلیسی
The principle of reinstatement governing most argument systems states that an argument is reinstated when all its defeaters are in turn ultimately defeated. Nevertheless, some criticisms to this principle have been offered in the literature. We found that problems arise when arguments in a chain of attacks are related by specificity: when non-maximally specific arguments are reinstated, fallacious justifications are originated. Particularly, we show how the problem affects DeLP, a system that combines a specificity-based defeat criterion with a reinstatement-based warrant process. Following old intuitions by philosopher Carl Hempel we rethink the concept's role within defeasible argumentation. Two kinds of specificity defeaters are identified: proper defeaters and cautious defeaters. While proper defeaters are well-known, cautious defeaters are formally introduced here. A system combining cautious and proper defeaters is defined as an extension of DeLP, and dialectic warrant games are proposed for filtering out non-maximally specific arguments.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Information and Computation - Volume 255, Part 2, August 2017, Pages 287-310
Journal: Information and Computation - Volume 255, Part 2, August 2017, Pages 287-310
نویسندگان
Gustavo Adrián Bodanza, Claudio Andrés Alessio,