Thermodynamics of complex coacervation

- Interpretation of endothermic and/or exothermic signals encountered during complexation and coacervation.
- Recommendations regarding ITC experimental design.
- Various built-in and custom-made models to fit the ITC data are discussed.
- Effect of different parameters on thermodynamics of coacervation.
- Comparison of ITC with other techniques (surface plasmon resonance and capillary electrophoresis).

Isothermal titration calorimetry has routinely been used to understand the thermodynamic characteristics of complexation and coacervation. Most commonly, built-in models that assume independent binding sites have been employed in these studies. However, the non-covalent nature of interactions and steric effects accompanying macromolecules require (i) usage of new models such as overlapping binding sites and Satake-Yang's two-state binding models and (ii) reformed interpretations of the data as two-stage structuring. Fitting data with these models, forces driving the interaction of polyelectrolytes with oppositely charged polyelectrolytes, surfactants, and proteins have been identified as electrostatics and/or counterion release with possible contributions from hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions. Additionally, for surfactant-polyelectrolyte coacervation, ITC signals indicated separate regions for formation of polymer-induced micelles and free micelles. Regardless of the type of the coacervation system, thermodynamics of coacervation is affected by the following parameters: pH and ionic strength of the medium, charge density, molecular weight of the polyelectrolyte, concentration, and mixing order of macroions. Lastly, we present a brief comparison between ITC on one hand and surface plasmon resonance or capillary electrophoresis on the other regarding their application in coacervation.