کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5033646 | 1370030 | 2017 | 11 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
We examine the extent to which both in-role (task performance) and extra-role dimensions of performance (organizational citizenship behaviors) account for variance in ratings of overall job performance by utilizing currently available meta-analytic estimates. Relative weight analysis results show that overall performance is determined more by three OCB forms in combination (RWÂ =Â 0.34; %RWÂ =Â 72.9%) than by task performance (RWÂ =Â 0.12; %RWÂ =Â 27.1%). Among the OCB forms, the relative weight of OCB-O (RWÂ =Â 0.17; %RWÂ =Â 36.9%) is greater than those of OCB-I (RWÂ =Â 0.11; %RWÂ =Â 0.22.9%) and OCB-CH (RWÂ =Â 0.06; %RWÂ =Â 13.1%). Consistent with the results from a relative weight analysis, results from a series of multiple regression analyses also show that the incremental contribution (ÎR2) of each performance dimension above and beyond the other performance dimensions is the highest for OCB-O (0.056), followed by those of task performance (0.041), OCB-CH (0.007), and OCB-I (0.003). We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings along with study limitations and future research directions.
Journal: Human Resource Management Review - Volume 27, Issue 1, March 2017, Pages 97-107