کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5034938 | 1471745 | 2017 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Little research exists on individual differences in environmental peer persuasion.
• Environmental moral exporting is related to two-way environmental conversations.
• Environmental belief superiority is linked with trying to control interactions.
• Both constructs correlate with Big-Five traits and general peer influence efforts.
• Future work should examine how these constructs influence actual conversations.
Traditional research on environmental behavior has explored the predictors of behavior change as a function of intervention efforts from an authority. The current research examines self-reported environmental behavior outside of these contexts, and in particular demonstrates the value in asking who attempts to influence the environmental behaviors of their peers. Environmental moral exporting and environmental belief superiority both related to efforts to influence the environmental behaviors of others, albeit in different ways. People high in moral exporting were more active in their efforts to influence the environmental behaviors of others, preferred a two-way dialogue between individuals, and enjoyed such interactions. Alternatively, individuals high in environmental belief superiority put relatively less effort into influencing others, compared to those high in environmental moral exporting, and tended to avoid environmental conversations. When individuals high in environmental belief superiority did have those conversations, they were likely to get frustrated and attempted to dominate the conversations. This research demonstrates the value in asking who tries to influence the environmental behavior of others and how they do so.
Journal: Journal of Environmental Psychology - Volume 49, April 2017, Pages 18–29