Playing 'hard to get': An economic rationale for crowding out of intrinsically motivated behavior

- We provide a novel strategic explanation for crowding out of intrinsic motivation.
- Our explanation does not involve changes in the actor׳s preferences or beliefs.
- We predict that crowding out effects are likely when an agent has “market power”.
- We show that the introduction of rewards may have negative welfare consequences.
- We explicitly relate our explanation to existing experimental evidence.

Anecdotal, empirical, and experimental evidence suggests that offering extrinsic rewards for certain activities can reduce people׳s willingness to engage in those activities voluntarily. We propose a simple rationale for this 'crowding out' phenomenon using standard economic arguments. The central idea is that the potential to earn rewards in return for an activity may create incentives to play 'hard to get' in an effort to increase those rewards. We discuss two specific contexts in which such incentives arise. In the first, refraining from the activity causes others to attach higher value to it because it becomes scarce. In the second, restraint serves to conceal the actor׳s intrinsic motivation. In both cases, not engaging in the activity causes others to offer larger rewards. Our theory yields the testable prediction that such effects are likely to occur when a motivated actor enjoys a sufficient degree of 'market power.'