کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
507913 | 865152 | 2013 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: SIPPI: A Matlab toolbox for sampling the solution to inverse problems with complex prior information: Part 2—Application to crosshole GPR tomography SIPPI: A Matlab toolbox for sampling the solution to inverse problems with complex prior information: Part 2—Application to crosshole GPR tomography](/preview/png/507913.png)
We present an application of the SIPPI Matlab toolbox, to obtain a sample from the a posteriori probability density function for the classical tomographic inversion problem. We consider a number of different forward models, linear and non-linear, such as ray based forward models that rely on the high frequency approximation of the wave-equation and ‘fat’ ray based forward models relying on finite frequency theory. In order to sample the a posteriori probability density function we make use of both least squares based inversion, for linear Gaussian inverse problems, and the extended Metropolis sampler, for non-linear non-Gaussian inverse problems. To illustrate the applicability of the SIPPI toolbox to a tomographic field data set we use a cross-borehole traveltime data set from Arrenæs, Denmark. Both the computer code and the data are released in the public domain using open source and open data licenses. The code has been developed to facilitate inversion of 2D and 3D travel time tomographic data using a wide range of possible a priori models and choices of forward models.
► An application of the SIPPI Matlab toolbox for sampling the solution to 2D and 3D tomographic inverse problems.
► Allow linear and non-linear forward models for travel time computation based on both high and finite frequency theory.
► Examples of using linear Gaussian least squares inversion.
► Examples of using the extended Metropolis sampler in 2D and 3D in a general non-linear formulation.
► For Gaussian prior model, the properties of the Gaussian model can be treated as model parameters inferred as part of the inversion.
Journal: Computers & Geosciences - Volume 52, March 2013, Pages 481–492