A unified model of settlement and trial expenditures: The Priest-Klein model extended

Settlement and trial expenditures are crucially interrelated. The literature on settlement, however, takes no account of models of trial. In this paper, we develop a unified model of settlement and trial expenditures. We do this by discarding the usual assumption of settlement models that trial costs are constant across cases. Instead, we follow the literature on trial by permitting trial costs to vary with the legal merit of the plaintiff's case. Our approach can be used to extend standard models of settlement such as the well-known Priest-Klein model as well as models based on asymmetric information. As a demonstration, we extend the Priest-Klein model and generally overturn that model's canonical results. In particular, we show that even in a fully symmetric model, predicted win rates at trial can deviate substantially from 50 percent. Furthermore, win rates will vary in response to legal reforms that shift the decision standard.

► Develop a unified model of case selection and trial expenditure. ► Demonstrate by extending Priest-Klein model to include endogenous trial costs. ► Overturn Priest-Klein model's canonical results.