کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
515050 | 866940 | 2011 | 19 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Text categorization pertains to the automatic learning of a text categorization model from a training set of preclassified documents on the basis of their contents and the subsequent assignment of unclassified documents to appropriate categories. Most existing text categorization techniques deal with monolingual documents (i.e., written in the same language) during the learning of the text categorization model and category assignment (or prediction) for unclassified documents. However, with the globalization of business environments and advances in Internet technology, an organization or individual may generate and organize into categories documents in one language and subsequently archive documents in different languages into existing categories, which necessitate cross-lingual text categorization (CLTC). Specifically, cross-lingual text categorization deals with learning a text categorization model from a set of training documents written in one language (e.g., L1) and then classifying new documents in a different language (e.g., L2). Motivated by the significance of this demand, this study aims to design a CLTC technique with two different category assignment methods, namely, individual- and cluster-based. Using monolingual text categorization as a performance reference, our empirical evaluation results demonstrate the cross-lingual capability of the proposed CLTC technique. Moreover, the classification accuracy achieved by the cluster-based category assignment method is statistically significantly higher than that attained by the individual-based method.
Research highlights
► Our CLTC technique uses a statistical-based bilingual thesaurus for translations.
► Our proposed CLTC technique demonstrates its cross-lingual capability.
► The cluster-based category assignment method outperforms the individual-base method.
► The individual-based method is less sensitive to the size of training examples.
Journal: Information Processing & Management - Volume 47, Issue 5, September 2011, Pages 786–804