Facilitating pre-operative assessment guidelines representation using SNOMED CT

ObjectiveTo investigate whether SNOMED CT covers the terms used in pre-operative assessment guidelines, and if necessary, how the measured content coverage can be improved.MethodsPre-operative assessment guidelines were retrieved from the websites of (inter)national anesthesia-related societies. The recommendations in the guidelines were rewritten to “IF condition THEN action” statements to facilitate data extraction. Terms were extracted from the IF–THEN statements and mapped to SNOMED CT. Content coverage was measured by using three scores: no match, partial match and complete match. Non-covered concepts were evaluated against the SNOMED CT editorial documentation.ResultsFrom 6 guidelines, 133 terms were extracted, of which 71% (n = 94) completely matched with SNOMED CT concepts. Disregarding the vague concepts in the included guidelines SNOMED CT’s content coverage was 89%. Of the 39 non-completely covered concepts, 69% violated at least one of SNOMED CT’s editorial principles or rules. These concepts were categorized based on four categories: non-reproducibility, classification-derived phrases, numeric ranges, and procedures categorized by complexity.ConclusionGuidelines include vague terms that cannot be well supported by terminological systems thereby hampering guideline-based decision support systems. This vagueness reduces the content coverage of SNOMED CT in representing concepts used in the pre-operative assessment guidelines. Formalization of the guidelines using SNOMED CT is feasible but to optimize this, first the vagueness of some guideline concepts should be resolved and a few currently missing but relevant concepts should be added to SNOMED CT.