Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance

A driving simulator study was conducted to evaluate the effects of five in-vehicle warning information displays upon drivers’ emergent response and decision performance. These displays include visual display, auditory displays with and without spatial compatibility, hybrid displays in both visual and auditory format with and without spatial compatibility. Thirty volunteer drivers were recruited to perform various tasks that involved driving, stimulus-response, divided attention and stress rating. Results show that for displays of single-modality, drivers benefited more when coping with visual display of warning information than auditory display with or without spatial compatibility. However, auditory display with spatial compatibility significantly improved drivers’ performance in reacting to the divided attention task and making accurate S-R task decision. Drivers’ best performance results were obtained for hybrid display with spatial compatibility. Hybrid displays enabled drivers to respond the fastest and achieve the best accuracy in both S-R and divided attention tasks.

► We investigated the effects of five in-vehicle warning information displays.
► For single display modality, visual display is better than auditory display.
► Auditory display with spatial compatibility improved drivers’ performance.
► Hybrid display with spatial compatibility caused the best performance results.