کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5507111 1536899 2017 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparative study of the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field and low level laser therapy on mitogen-activated protein kinases
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بررسی مقایسه ای اثربخشی میدان الکترومغناطیسی پالس و لیزر درمانی کم بر روی پروتئین کیناز فعال شده با میتوژن
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی زیست شیمی
چکیده انگلیسی


- PEMFT stimulates all pathways of MAPKs including ERK, P38 and C-Jun-terminal.
- LLLT stimulates only the ERK pathway in MAPKS activation pathways.
- PEMFT has a powerful healing effect more than LLLT as it increase the activation of ERK, P38 and C-Jun-N Terminal.
- LLLT has more potent pain decreasing effect than PEMFT as it does not activate p38 pathway.
- PEMFT should not be used as pain killer modality in acute pain but it's very useful to be used in chronic pain management with hypothalamic -ve Ingram due to its stimulatory effect on P38.

Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases (MAPKs) consist of three major signaling members: extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p38 and C-JUN N-terminal kinase (JNK). We investigated physiological effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy (PEMFT) and Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on human body, adopting the expression level of mitogen-activated protein kinases as an indicator via assessment of the activation levels of three major families of MAPKS, ERK, p38 and JNK in the peripheral lymphocytes of patients before and after the therapies. Assessment for the expression levels of MAPKs families' were done, in the peripheral lymphocytes of patients recently have appendectomy, using flow cytometric analysis of multiple signaling pathways, pre and post LLLT and PEMFT application (twice daily for 6 successive days) on the appendectomy wound. There were non-significant differences in the expression levels of MAPKs families' pre- therapies application. But there were significant increase in the ERK expression levels post application of LLLT compared to its pre application (p<0.01). Also, there was significant increase in the ERK, p38 and C-Jun N terminal expression level values post application of PEMFT compared to its pre application expression levels (p<0.01 for each). The present study demonstrates that PEMFT has a powerful healing effect more than LLLT as it increase the activation of ERK, P38 and C-Jun-N Terminal while LLLT only increase the activation of ERK. LLLT has more potent pain decreasing effect than PEMFT as it does not activate P38 pathway like PEMFT.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports - Volume 9, March 2017, Pages 316-321
نویسندگان
, , , ,