کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
551179 872809 2012 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Relationships between psychophysically acceptable and maximum voluntary hand force capacity in the context of underlying biomechanical limitations
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی کامپیوتر تعامل انسان و کامپیوتر
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Relationships between psychophysically acceptable and maximum voluntary hand force capacity in the context of underlying biomechanical limitations
چکیده انگلیسی

This research investigated if proportional relationships between psychophysically acceptable and maximum voluntary hand forces are dependent on the underlying biomechanical factor (i.e. whole body balance or joint strength) that limited the maximum voluntary hand force. Eighteen healthy males completed two unilateral maximal exertions followed by a 30 min psychophysical load-adjust protocol in each of nine pre-defined standing scenarios. Center of pressure (whole body balance) and joint moments (joint strength) were calculated to evaluate whether balance or joint strength was most likely limiting maximum voluntary hand force. The ratio of the psychophysically acceptable force to the maximal force was significantly different depending on the underlying biomechanical factor. Psychophysically acceptable hand forces were selected at 86.3 ± 19.7% of the maximum voluntary hand force when limited by balance (pulling exertions), 67.5 ± 15.2% when limited by joint strength (downward pressing) and 78 ± 23% when the limitation was undefined in medial exertions.


► Workers exerted both maximum (MVF) and psychophysically acceptable forces (PAF).
► PAF, as a percentage of MVF was highest during balance limited exertions (pulling).
► PAF, as a percentage of MVF was lowest during strength limited exertions (downward).
► PAF as a function of MVF is dependent on the underlying biomechanical weakest link.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Applied Ergonomics - Volume 43, Issue 5, September 2012, Pages 813–820
نویسندگان
, , , ,