کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5527759 1547886 2017 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Research paperRuxolitinib for the management of myelofibrosis: Results of an international physician survey
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Research paperRuxolitinib for the management of myelofibrosis: Results of an international physician survey
چکیده انگلیسی


- There is marked variability between physicians regarding ruxolitinib use in myelofibrosis.
- MPN-focused physicians are more tolerant of anemia and thrombocytopenia as indications for ruxolitinib dose reductions.
- MPN-focused physicians approach ruxolitinib refractoriness differently from non MPN focused physicians.
- Physicians should be encouraged to use MPN-specific symptom scoring systems.

BackgroundRuxolitinib is established as treatment for symptomatic myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis. The strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and dose modification rules that applied to the COMFORTI and II studies that led to the licensing of ruxolitinib are not always applicable to routine clinical practice. Thus physicians now face decisions regarding ruxolitinib use that were not addressed in these pivotal trials.MethodsWe performed an online survey of hematologists practicing in Europe, Israel, the United Kingdom and the United States. Demographic details regarding the physicians and their practice as relates to MPNs were collected. Management decisions pertaining to the use of ruxolitinib were obtained regarding 10 clinical scenarios relating to anemia, thrombocytopenia, frailty, infection and lack or loss of response to ruxolitnib in MF patients.Results140 physicians responded to the survey. There were marked differences regarding their decisions for ruxolitinib administration in MF patients with or developing anemia or thrombocytopenia. Similarly there was little consensus regarding management of patients refractory or losing a response to ruxolitinib. There were differences between “MPN-focused” and “non-MPN-focused” physicians in certain areas.ConclusionPhysician practices regarding management of MF patients experiencing ruxolitinib-related toxicities or in whom response to the drug is lost was variable. This was true of “MPN-focused” and “non-MPN-focused” physicians in certain cases. Physician education and experience in using ruxolitinib may improve patient management.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Leukemia Research - Volume 61, October 2017, Pages 6-9
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,