کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
5528354 1547955 2017 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
ReviewTimeliness of access to lung cancer diagnosis and treatment: A scoping literature review
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بررسی زمان دسترسی به تشخیص و درمان سرطان ریه: یک مرور ادبی پیچیده
کلمات کلیدی
سرطان ریه، زمان انتظار، دسترسی، به موقع بودن بررسی ادبیات،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی تحقیقات سرطان
چکیده انگلیسی


- Significant variation exists in how access to lung cancer care is reported.
- Many patients are waiting longer than recommended for diagnosis and treatment.
- Standardization of meaningful wait intervals across the care continuum is needed.
- Common metrics can improve ability to assess quality, interventions, and outcomes.

The Institute of Medicine recently called for increased understanding of and commitment to timely care. Lung cancer can be difficult to diagnose, resulting in delays that may adversely affect survival; rapid diagnosis and treatment therefore is critical for enabling improved patient outcomes. This scoping review provides an update on timeliness of lung cancer care over the past decade. We searched PubMed for English-language articles published from 2007 to 2016 that report wait time intervals related to diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Two authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts for inclusion. Abstracted data included sample size, patient population, study type, dates of study, wait times, and information on disparities, survival, costs, healthcare utilization, and interventions. The final review included 65 studies from 21 different countries. A total of 96 unique variations of wait intervals were reported (e.g., time to diagnosis from first pulmonologist visit, imaging, or initial evaluation), making comparisons across studies difficult. The most common interval was diagnosis to treatment initiation, with reported medians ranging from 6 to 45 days. Fourteen articles reported information on survival, 14 on healthcare utilization, 18 on disparities, and 14 on interventions; results varied by study. Significant variation exists in how access to care time delays are reported. Many patients across different facilities and countries appear to be facing substantial waits to receive lung cancer diagnosis and care. Further research, using common wait-interval metrics, is needed to evaluate and improve timeliness of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Lung Cancer - Volume 112, October 2017, Pages 156-164
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,