کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
556424 874422 2015 13 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Assessing data access issues in online platforms
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
ارزیابی مسائل دسترسی به داده ها در سیستم عامل های آنلاین
کلمات کلیدی
سیستم عامل چند طرفه، مقررات دسترسی، داده های کاربر، امکانات ضروری، موتورهای جستجو، شبکه های اجتماعی آنلاین، سیستم عامل های تجارت الکترونیک
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی کامپیوتر سیستم های اطلاعاتی
چکیده انگلیسی


• Access to data is crucial for service provision on both the user and the advertiser side of online platforms.
• In this context, data may evolve into a necessary input for competitors.
• Private antitrust cases on access to user data have already occurred in the US.
• EU authorities are more likely to accept antitrust liability for data access refusals.
• Nevertheless, a high legal burden has to be overcome under Article 102 TFEU.

Online platforms have the characteristics of a particular type of market known as ‘multi-sided’. These businesses create value by bringing advertisers and users together. Access to user data is critical to this process. On the basis of economic literature, the features of multi-sided platforms will be discussed. It will be argued that the characteristics of multi-sided platforms increase the likelihood that successful companies become dominant due to the existence of indirect network effects. In these circumstances, dominant platforms may foreclose competition by raising barriers to entry in the large collections of user data. This may give rise to access problems for competitors and new entrants that need access to data gathered by dominant platforms in order to provide competing or complementary services. A comparative legal analysis will be used to assess the standards that are applicable in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU) for finding liability for refusals to deal under antitrust or competition law. The private antitrust cases that have already occurred regarding access to user data in the US show that the scope of applicability of the US essential facilities doctrine is very limited after the judgment of the Supreme Court in Trinko. Although the European Commission and the European Court of Justice seem to be willing to accept liability for a refusal to deal more easily than their US counterparts, high legal hurdles still have to be met under the essential facilities doctrine in the EU. Nevertheless, there are scenarios in which liability for refusals to give access to data will likely be accepted in the EU.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Telecommunications Policy - Volume 39, Issue 5, June 2015, Pages 375–387
نویسندگان
, , ,