Enhanced ultrasound strain imaging using chirp-coded pulse excitation

To improve the quality of ultrasound strain imaging, chirp-coded pulse excitation which can enhance echo signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR) was used. The effects of various factors on chirp-coded strain imaging were investigated. Five chirp schemes were designed to investigate the relationship of the range side lobe level (RSLL), main lobe width and energy for strain imaging. We use phase zero method with amplitude modulation correction as strain estimator. The simulation results demonstrate that elastographic signal-to-noise ratio (SNRe) for chirp pulse decreases with the RSLL and the main lobe width, and that there is a tradeoff among choosing a high-energy tapering window function, reducing the RSLL and narrowing the main lobe in designing a chirp scheme for strain imaging. Chirp pulse performs much better than conventional short pulse in low eSNR, great depth or high attenuation conditions due to the increased eSNR with it. However, in high eSNR condition, the increased eSNR with chirp pulse does not improve SNRe, and the performance of chirp pulse mainly depends on the RSLL and main lobe width. Some chirp schemes still achieve higher SNRe than short pulse in high eSNR condition, because these chirp schemes have narrower main lobe than short pulse and have very low RSLL. Chirp pulse has better lesion detectability and axial strain resolution than short pulse especially in low eSNR condition, because chirp pulse can use shorter window length to get the same SNRe that is achieved by short pulse. Within the scope of five window functions (Tukey, Lanczos, Parzen, Dolph–Chebyshev and Kaiser), we tried to find the optimal chirp scheme which is possibly the combination of chirp pulse excitation with 40% tapered Tukey window and matched compression filter. A commercial elastic phantom experiment on a freehand strain imaging system further validates the superior performance of chirp pulse.

► We applied chirp-coded pulse excitation to ultrasound strain imaging and investigated effects of various factors.
► Chirp pulse performs much better than conventional short pulse in low echo signal-to-noise ratio (eSNR) conditions.
► Some chirp schemes can achieve higher elastographic signal-to-noise ratio than short pulse in high eSNR conditions.
► The performance of chirp pulse mainly depends on the RSLL and main lobe width in high eSNR conditions.
► There is a tradeoff among energy, RSLL and main lobe width in designing a chirp scheme for strain imaging.