Full length articleA field assessment of claw removal impacts on the movement and survival of stone crabs Menippe spp.

- In situ mark-recapture analysis of effects of claw removal on stone crabs.
- Decreased survival of declawed crabs, as indicated by recapture probability.
- Crabs with fishery-related, regenerated claws comprised 3% of legal crabs.
- Claw type ratios in commercial catch reflected non-compliance with regulations.

Claw-only crab fisheries are often marketed as renewable because crabs are returned to the water after declawing to regenerate claws and re-enter the fishery. The challenge of managing a claw-only fishery for stone crabs (Menippe spp.) is compounded by varying regulations throughout their range that include the number of claws harvested from a crab and use of a seasonal closure to protect spawning females. We conducted mark-recapture studies to examine crab responses to claw removal in the field and compared claw handedness and type (crusher, intermediate, pincer) in a wild population to commercial landings to examine compliance with fishery regulations in a one-claw fishery with no seasonal closure. Declawed crabs were recaptured less frequently than control crabs, particularly if claw removal created large wounds. Control crabs were more commonly recaptured within one month of tagging and declawed crabs recaptured one to three months after tagging, suggesting that declawed crabs were less mobile or less motivated to feed initially after claws were harvested and that, over time, intact crabs left the study area. Crabs with fishery-related, regenerated claws comprised 3% of crabs with legal claws. Claw type ratios in a limited assessment of the commercial catch most closely reflected expected ratios consistent with a two-claw fishery, indicating that voluntary adherence to current one-claw fishing regulations is not universal. In fisheries needing better protection of spawning stock, a seasonal closure on fishing could be instituted to ensure better protection of spawning.