کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
5901850 | 1568984 | 2016 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

- Vitamin D status plays an important role in the consideration of statin-induced myopathy.
- Correction of vitamin D deficiency (⩽20âng/mL) can improve statin tolerance rates.
- Low vitamin D concentrations may be considered a modifiable risk factor for muscle-related adverse effects of statins.
IntroductionThere is a multitude of evidence supporting the benefit of statin use in cardiovascular disease; however, statin-induced myopathy is a major reason for statin discontinuation and non-adherence. Vitamin D deficiency has been independently associated with muscle weakness and severe myopathy, and may be a confounder for statin-induced myopathies. Since there is no consensus on a treatment course of action for statin-induced myopathy, investigation into potential confounders to elucidate the dynamics of statin-induced myopathy is warranted.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted on 105 patients in a cardiometabolic clinic with a vitamin D drawn from December 2006 to April 2008. Patients exposed to statins were divided into two groups: (1) patients with low vitamin D (<32âng/mL) [nâ=â52] and (2) patients with a sufficient vitamin D level (⩾32âng/mL) [nâ=â32]. Data were compared via t-tests or Fisher's Exact, as appropriate.ResultsThere were 41 statin-specific myopathies amongst the 24 statin-intolerant patients. Low vitamin D was significantly associated with statin-induced myopathy (pâ=â0.048). Following prescription vitamin D supplementation, statin tolerance rates were significantly higher in patients with a baseline vitamin D ⩽20âng/mL than those with a baseline vitamin D >20âng/mL (90% vs 33%; pâ=â0.036).ConclusionVitamin D status may be considered a modifiable risk factor for muscle-related adverse effects of statins, and supplementation of vitamin D (particularly when ⩽20âng/mL) may improve statin tolerance.
Journal: Journal of Clinical & Translational Endocrinology - Volume 6, December 2016, Pages 56-59