Comparison of everolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents in dialysis patients

BackgroundWe previously reported that the incidence of 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients treated with paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) was lower than that in the sirolimus-eluting stents in dialysis patients. However, it remains unclear whether there are differences in clinical outcomes between everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and PES.MethodsBetween February 2010 and September 2013, 102 maintenance dialysis patients with 135 lesions treated with EES were compared to 107 maintenance dialysis patients with 147 lesions treated with PES. One-year clinical outcomes were investigated.ResultsDiabetes mellitus was present in 64.7% in the EES group and 71.0% in the PES group (p = 0.33). Heavy calcification was in 27.4% vs. 34.0% (p = 0.23). Rotational atherectomy was undergone in 11.1% vs. 23.1% (p < 0.01). Total stented length was not significantly different (23.5 ± 14.6 mm vs. 24.4 ± 13.2 mm, p = 0.60). One patient in the EES group was lost to follow up. At 12 months, MACE occurred in 13.2% in the EES group and 17.4% in the PES group (p = 0.25). Target lesion revascularization (TLR) was observed in 9.5% vs. 10.4% respectively (p = 0.77). Mortality was 11.8% vs. 13.1% (p = 0.35). Cardiac death was 5.0% vs. 7.7% (p = 0.09). Definite stent thrombosis was observed in 2.0% vs. 0% (p = 0.14). Subgroup analysis in patients with diabetes mellitus revealed no significant differences in MACE (12.7% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.36), TLR (8.3% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.42), mortality (13.7% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.28), and cardiac death (6.3% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.15) between the two groups.ConclusionsOne-year clinical outcomes following EES and PES implantations are similar in dialysis patients.